“Parents sue school after son gets punished for using AI on class project.” That’s the short summary of a story trending this week about Massachusetts-based Jennifer and Dale Harris who are suing their son’s school claiming the student handbook “failed to clarify when AI could be used appropriately.”
The story is a symbol of a confusing reality playing out in schools across the world. What’s the right way to use AI in classrooms and when (if at all) should it be banned? It also intersects lots of other issues like privilege (the student’s family can afford a lawyer), policy versus ethics, helicopter parenting (fighting kids battles for them) and terminology (is using AI considered plagiarism?)
While this seems like a relatively simple story of one kid whose parents are using legal methods to get him out of trouble, I suspect at some point a highly symbolic story of student vs. AI vs. school will become a landmark legal case that perhaps elevates all the way to the Supreme Court in the U.S. to determine what is and isn’t allowed.
Regardless of what you think about the parents and their distinctly American choice to turn to litigation as a first resort, the question asked here is undeniably important: what is an acceptable way to use AI in the classroom? We already need a better answer for that.
