I used to sit in the front seat of a taxi. When I lived in Sydney, it was a cultural rite of passage … a learned behaviour that revealed an acquired understanding about the Australian culture. As I headed towards the southern hemisphere earlier this week and landed in South Africa, the impulse struck me again to choose the front seat, and I did.
Amidst an ordinary chat with my driver about the unusually overcast weather in "Jozi" – our conversation turned to the remarkably recognizable face of Nelson Mandela still iconized on billboards along the highway headed into downtown Johannesburg. At 93, he is still very much the heart of this young nation that many look to for inspiration. As we talked of his impact, my driver asked:
"If a man held prisoner for more than 27 years could forgive the men who held him captive – what right do I have to remain angry or seek vengeance against those who may have hurt me?"
He was sharing something that anyone who has been inspired by a real leader might feel. Mandela was the face of a revolution because he offered hope for a world most people wanted to live in. Much longer ago in India, Gandhi offered similar hope and was the emblem of how a peaceful revolution could overthrow a colonial invader. In Tibet, it was the Dalai Lama. The Czech Republic had Václav Havel. Much longer ago the Americans had George Washington, and the list could easily go on and on.
Throughout human history, it has become an obvious fact that revolutions are fueled by extraordinary leaders. At least, it was obvious until now. In both Egypt and Tunisia, the revolutions in those countries have often been described as "leaderless."
It is not just political revolutions happening without leaders either. As large groups of people self organize around ideas and self identify with ideals, revolutions of thought from the profound to the every day are taking place without the guidance of one person. There is no President of Wikipedia.
All of which leads to a big question: in an age where leaders are becoming optional, are ideas alone enough to unite us? My driver may have supported a revolution, but it is Mandela who inspires him each day. People inspire people – and in a leaderless revolution what can replace human inspiration?
This was the first big thought that struck me as I landed in South Africa. The second was that I should really sit in the front seat of a taxi more often.
Those men were great leaders because the put the concerns of there fellow man before their own. It was the country they were representing not themselves and their own agendas.
While I agree that people inspire people, I also believe that ideas alone can be enough to unite us. While it is not always the case, too often leaders or representatives that are chosen get a taste of power and greed and forget why they became or were chosen as a leader in the first place.
In contrast, when people come together united by an idea, even without a leader, great things can happen. Volunteer and non-profit groups usually begin with a few people that have the same ideas about how to better their community, fix a problem or raise money for a cause.
Wow! I love this. This is my first visit to your blog. (I found you by way of Open Forum.) It’s made me stop and think about a lot of things – about the fine art of forgiveness – such a difficult thing to do – and about different perspectives when you slow down and take an interest in others. (ie sitting in the front seat of the taxi)
thank you!
when really people what the change then they will come together united by an idea for eg the revolution in Egypt where people only participated and got change in their political situation.