Blog Header
The Insights Blog

Dedicated To Helping Readers
Be More Interesting
Since 2004.

As Featured In:

Microsoft Losing Marketing Battle for Email Users

Hotmail is dying.  As I noted several months ago, my Hotmail account was the direct casualty of the coming of Gmail. There were even online eulogies.  Despite every reason to keep using Hotmail (I use their messenger client, run windows at work, even have a complete address book set up at my Hotmail account) – I too made the switch last year and left Hotmail behind.  A recent Marketing Sherpa study release says the same thing.  People are leaving Hotmail.  But what is the primary reason for this mass defection?  In my previous post, I suggested that Hotmail was a victim of its own initial dominance in the webmail space.  People had their first email addresses at Hotmail, have held them the longest, and therefore now receive the most spam there as they signed up for offers, ordered products and distributed their Hotmail address widely across the Internet.

Looking deeper at their demise, I wonder if perhaps branding was a key part of their problem as well.  Google has Gmail, Yahoo has "Yahoo Mail" – both of which tie to their parent brands.  "Hotmail" was an anomaly.  Did this mean the brand of Hotmail didn’t get the same marketing support as other Microsoft initatives?  Word, Excel, Powerpoint all started with the "MS" tag in front of them.  They are clearly Microsoft brands.  The MSN butterfly came onto the scene late.  Today Hotmail, Messenger and Passport all have the "MSN" tag in front of them – and perhaps for MSN Messenger or the Passport network this will work, because Microsoft was still establishing the brands.  But they are all based on the success of Hotmail, which hasn’t turned out the way Microsoft envisioned.   As odd as it seems to find Microsoft on the losing end of a marketing strategy battle – in Hotmail it seems that’s exactly where they are.   

2 thoughts on “Microsoft Losing Marketing Battle for Email Users”

  1. Part of the “anomoly” of Hotmail’s branding may have started from good branding impulses. When MS acquired Hotmail (when? 1997?), it was the It brand for web-based e-mail. Microsoft itself wasn’t too popular with tech-savvy webusers–remember, this was in the era of the DoJ antimonopoly boondoggle (and a much higher percentage of Net users were techies in that day). Microsoft may have correctly perceived early on that Hotmail as a brand was viable, and Microsoft’s own brand didn’t bring anything to it. I remember predicting it would be a massive degradation of Hotmail; this did temporarily come true, as Hotmail had massive slowdowns and frequent outages during the changeover period.

    My guess is that the brand relationship changed over time, and they realized it a little too late.

    (Also, it doesn’t hurt that Y! Mail and Gmail are both vastly superior. I stopped using Hotmail year ago.)

  2. There was certainly a time when avoiding tagging a service with the Microsoft brand would have been a good thing. There are also recent examples where companies have a new service or technology, but are afraid to associate their brand with it initially in case it fails. The result is that you launch a second diluted brand which leaves you only two options for the future – failure because of lack of brand support, or success which would eventually mean a rebranding or at the least a repositioning to align with your existing brand (or ditching your existing brand altogether). One would think that if a company has enough belief in a new product or service, they would be willing to put the full resources of their brand behind it. Assuming, of course, that the brand has positive value (which you note was probably not the case for Microsoft in the late 90s).


Leave a Comment

Vector Smart Object

About Rohit

A keynote speaker on trends, innovation, marketing, storytelling and diversity.

Rohit Bhargava is on a mission to inspire more non-obvious thinking in the world. He is the #1 Wall Street Journal and USA Today bestselling author of eight books and is widely considered one of the most entertaining and original speakers on disruption, trends and marketing in the world.

Rohit has been invited to keynote events in 32 countries … and over the past year, given more than 100 virtual talks from his home studio. He previously spent 15 years as a marketing strategist at Ogilvy and Leo Burnett and also teaches marketing and storytelling as an adjunct professor at Georgetown University.

He loves the Olympics, actively hates cauliflower and is a proud dad of boys.

Rohit Bhargava About (1)


Do you need a speaker that can help your audience be more innovative and anticipate the future?

For more than a decade, Rohit Bhargava has been inspiring audiences at NASA, Disney, Schwab, Microsoft, SXSW, Coca-Cola and hundreds of other clients with his signature non-obvious keynote presentations. He is a master at weaving recent stories into his talks in a way that helps audiences better understand the world today, while also preparing to lead the future.

Non Obvious Insights
Layer 97
Non Obvious Insights Newsletter
Layer 118

Skip the obvious and anticipate the future with our weekly newsletter. Join over 25,000 subscribers and start receiving the stories (and insights) you’ve been missing.


#1 WSJ & USAToday Bestselling Author

Rohit is the author of 8 books on trends, the future of business, building a more human brand with storytelling and how to create a more diverse and inclusive world.

Vector Smart Object


Have a Question or Inquiry?

Just fill out this form, and we’ll get back to you within 24 hours!

About You

What Are You Contacting Us About*:

Your Message